Description
It's Not Easy Being Green! Part 1
Product Category: Connected Home
Price: $995
Release Date: Q3 2008
Authors: Sarah Crisman, Michael Greeson
Pages: 62
Figures: 8
Tables: 26
TDG Member Download
Download the complimentary Market dBrief,™
The Lean on the Green
Scene.
It’s Not Easy Being Green! Part 2:
Importance of Energy Efficiency &
Environmental Friendliness in Next PC Purchase
It’s Not Easy Being Green! Part 3:
Consumer Perception of Leading Technology Brands

Summary
Are American consumers really “going green”? Are the products
they buy, the activities in which they engage, and the attitudes they hold
consistent with “going green”? Does the “greenness” of a product or service
really make any difference when it comes to purchasing, say, a new PC? Are we
truly adopting eco-sensitive behaviors?
No doubt due in part to the price of gasoline and oil
products, and a growing awareness among consumers about global climate issues,
the popular imagination seems squarely focused on what we can do to conserve our
resources and preserve our environment. As with previous times in our history,
however, what we (as companies and consumers) profess publicly often differs
from our private conduct.
Pundits,
politicians, and marketers may have been riding the “green” wave steadily for
the past 6-12 months, but distinguishing this movement from a fad to a
potentially significant shift in social evolution requires further contemplation
of consumer behavior. Companies accurately targeting the “green” consumer could
provide a compelling edge over competitors that could potentially propel this
present trend into a substantial social movement of indubitable worth, thus
effectively setting their brand ahead of the industry curve (not to mention the
greater benefit to the planet).
The curiosity lies in whether today’s “green shift” is
genuine, and whether real-world consumer behavior reflects public rhetoric. This
report offers new research to help companies evaluate the “green” message as a
viable strategy for differentiating one’s products and services. Again, the
social worth is unquestionable; the persuasive value seems strong; but the green
in our wallets may have a stronger pull than the green of our social
disposition.
This is the first of three reports TDG is producing on the
relationship between eco- and energy-friendly behavior and consumer technology.
This first report presents an overview of what adult consumers perceive and how
they behave in regard to a variety of green-related issues. The second report
will offer insight into how these perceptions translate into brand preferences
and PC purchasing habits. The third discusses which technology brands consumers
perceive to be most ‘green’.
Key Findings From the Report:
-
The optimal target for green technologies is not necessarily the most tech-savvy consumer.
- Most consumers participate in simple forms of green behavior such as recycling household debris or replacing incandescent light bulbs. However, more progressive green behavior (such as purchasing a hybrid automobile or switching to a non-fossil fuel-based energy provider) remains limited to less than 5% of adult consumers.
- More than half of adult consumers are to varying degrees concerned with the environmental impact of the CE and technology they buy and use, though only 10% express a critical concern. The fact that 42% of consumers lack any level of concern is alarming, given the public focus on environmental issues.
From the Report
Interestingly, those with annual incomes at the extremes of the scale (greater
than $100,000 and less than $25,000) are more likely to agree with the
proposition that excess use of fossil fuels is a legitimate threat to our
environment: more than half of these income segments agreed with the statement.
Conversely, those with incomes above $75,000 and below
$100,000 are least likely to believe this is true: only 39% agree with the
statement. This is a very interesting contrast, one which begs the question as
to why these differences are related to income extremes. Not surprisingly, these
income extremes are also related to educational extremes: the highest and lowest
levels of income correspond to the greatest and least educated consumers. It is
the middle income levels (those between $25,000 and $100,000) who do not buy
into the truth of the proposition.
The mainstream and liberal press present a picture of fossil
fuel usage and global warming as integrally (and causally) related. The
conservative and pro-business press, on the other hand, argues that global
warming is not related to the increased use of fossil fuels by humans. Why,
then, would those with a mainstream income disagree more frequently than others
regarding the truth of this assertion?
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1.0 Opening Comments
1.1 Project Rationale
1.2 Research Methodology
2.0 Concern with Environmental Impact of CE
and Technology Purchases
and Usage
2.1 Generally
2.2 Impact of Various Demographic/Psychographic Factors
3.0 Consumer Beliefs and Behavior Related
to Environmental and Social
Issues
3.1 Generally
3.2 Impact of Key Demographic and Behavioral Attributes
4.0 Travel-Related Green Activities
4.1 Generally
4.2 Impact of Key Demographic and Behavioral Attributes
5.0 Home-Related Green Activities
5.1 Generally
5.2 Impact of Key Demographic and Behavioral Attributes
6.0 Consumer Electronic Recycling Habits
6.1 Generally
6.2 Impact of Key Demographic and Behavioral Attributes
7.0 Reflections & Recommendations
List of Figures
Figure 1 Consumer Electronic
Recycling Habits
Figure 2 Travel-Related Green Behavior
Figure 3 Residential Green Behavior
Figure 4 Concern with Environmental Impact
of CE and Technology
Purchases and Usage
Figure 5 Statements Which Best Describe
Consumer Beliefs and Activities
Figure 6 Travel-Related Green Behavior,
Generally
Figure 7 Residential Green Behavior,
Generally
Figure 8 Consumer Electronic Recycling
Habits
List of Tables
Table 1 Concern about
Environmental Impact of CE & Technology
Purchases by Gender
Table 2 Concern about
Environmental Impact of CE & Technology
Purchases by Age
Table 3 Concern about
Environmental Impact of CE & Technology
Purchases by Ethnicity
Table 4 Concern about
Environmental Impact of CE & Technology
Purchases by Income
Table 5 Concern about
Environmental Impact of CE & Technology
Purchases by Political Affiliation
Table 6 Concern about
Environmental Impact of CE & Technology
Purchases by Tech Adopter Status
Table 7 Statements Which Best
Describe Consumer Beliefs and Activities
by Gender
Table 8 Statements Which Best
Describe Consumer Beliefs and Activities
by Age
Table 9 Statements Which Best
Describe Consumer Beliefs and Activities
by Income
Table 10 Statements Which Best Describe
Consumer Beliefs and Activities
by Tech Adopter Status
Table 11 Statements Which Best Describe
Consumer Beliefs and Activities
by Political Affiliation
Table 12 Travel-Related Green Behavior by
Gender
Table 13 Travel-Related Green Behavior by
Age
Table 14 Travel-Related Green Behavior by
Income
Table 15 Travel-Related Green Behavior by
Tech Adopter Status
Table 16 Travel-Related Green Behavior by
Political Affiliation
Table 17 Residential Green Behavior by
Gender
Table 18 Residential Green Behavior by Age
Table 19 Residential Green Behavior by
Income
Table 20 Residential Green Behavior by Tech
Adopter Status
Table 21 Residential Green Behavior by
Political Affiliation
Table 22 Consumer Electronic Recycling
Habits by Gender
Table 23 Consumer Electronic Recycling
Habits by Age
Table 24 Consumer Electronic Recycling
Habits by Income
Table 25 Consumer Electronic Recycling
Habits by Tech Adopter Status
Table 26 Consumer Electronic Recycling
Habits by Political Affiliation